Anti-Financial Crime & Financial Crime Compliance
Regulatory Intelligence Leadership | Insight | Network

Archives

Page 431/461

  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • ...
  • 429
  • 430
  • 431
  • 432
  • 433
  • ...
  • 461
  • Next →

    • Regulatory Watch News

    • Update to UK Sanctions List: Russia Regime

      UK Government

      Today, Tuesday 14th July, the UK Government has varied the following individual under the Russia sanction regime. Individual varied:

      Name: Unique ID:
      Christodoulos VASSILIADES RUS1825

    • New member appointed to the Regulatory Decisions Committee

      Financial Conduct Authority

      The FCA Board has appointed Dan Lavender as a new member of its Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC).
      The RDC is responsible for taking certain regulatory decisions on behalf of the FCA relating to contested enforcement action. Committee members bring a broad range of professional experience to support fair, independent and evidence-based decision-making. Alison Potter, the Chair of the RDC, said: ‘I am delighted to welcome Dan to the committee. Dan has significant legal and leadership experience in relation to contentious financial services matters, so his skill set will complement existing committee members and enhance the overall capability and effectiveness of the RDC.’

    • AMLA consults on harmonised risk assessments in the non-financial sector

      AMLA

      A shared methodology across the EU: AMLA is inviting views on draft rules that will determine how supervisors in every Member State assess money laundering and terrorism financing risks of businesses and professionals in the non-financial sector. Criminal money enters the economy in many ways, often through everyday transactions, from property purchases to luxury goods, professional services, or gambling. That makes it important for businesses in the non-financial sector to recognise and address the risk of being misused for money laundering or terrorist financing. Supervisors, in turn, need to understand the levels of risk that different businesses face, so they can allocate their resources accordingly. The draft standards give them a shared methodology for assessing that risk, so similar businesses are assessed on the same terms wherever they operate.

    Sign Up To Our Newsletter

    Contact Us