THE cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX has been fined $100 million for deliberately ignoring U.S. AML laws in order to boost revenue, the U.S. Department of Justice has said.
BitMEX, also known as HDR Global Trading, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge John Koeltl in Manhattan, after pleading guilty last July.
Subscribe now to have unlimited access
With our membership subscription, you will have unlimited access to the AML Intelligence site, updated daily with the latest analysis, opinion, and breaking news across the sector, newsletter delivered twice per week, access to our Global Bank Fines & Penalties database, free access to Boardroom Series and more!
FINTRAC imposes an administrative monetary penalty on Commerciale I.C. – Pacific Inc.
FINTRAC
FINTRAC announced today that it has imposed an administrative monetary penalty on Commerciale I.C. - Pacific Inc., also operating as I.C. - Pacific Trading Inc. Following a compliance examination, this money services business, in Montréal, Quebec, was imposed an administrative monetary penalty of $224,235 on September 2, 2025, for non-compliance with Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and associated Regulations.
OLAF supports anti-fraud Greek authorities in building advanced analytical capabilities
OLAF
On 3 - 4 February 2026, OLAF experts delivered a two-day training course in Athens for 100 financial analysts and investigators from the Directorate Αgainst Organised Crime. The training focused on the processing and analysis of large volumes of financial data and Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT), while also introducing the basic principles of an OLAF investigation, including the effective use of analytical elements in investigative work.
Order subject to penalty on IDSG for failing to comply with demand for information
DNB
De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. (DNB) has imposed an order subject to penalty on IDSG Group B.V. (IDSG). This is because IDSG failed to fully comply with DNB’s demand for information.To determine whether IDSG invited repayable funds from the public in non-compliance with Section 3:5 of the Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht – Wft), DNB repeatedly requested – and most recently demanded – that IDSG provide information. When IDSG failed to respond to the demand, DNB determined that IDSG had not met its statutory obligation to cooperate under Section 5:20(1) of the General Administrative Law Act (Algemene wet bestuursrecht – Awb). DNB accordingly imposed an order subject to penalty on IDSG on 3 September 2025, giving the institution 10 business days to comply with its information request.